The only way a Hindu marriage can be safe and lasting in India now
In the light of the changed scenario in India with fucked up laws which put all the power in the hands of the woman with no checks and balances, there is now only one way by which a Hindu marriage can be lasting and safe for the male. The marriage can be safe and lasting when marriage happens between an SC/ST male and a non SC/ST female. The reason is simple. A SC/ST male can file a case without proof saying that his caste was insulted. The female can put a case without proof of dowry and abuse and all the chimichanga that has been given to them by the female renuka chowdhury. So in the case of a marriage between a SC/ST male and a non SC/ST female, the power of both parties is somewhat balanced (responsibility is still unfotunately put as a burden on the male...he is still expected to provide for the family even if the bitch is educated). But it is a lot better than a non SC/ST guy marrying any female because he cannot file a case without proof against his wife and get her arrested...so he is vulnerable to torture by the bitch. So men of India, if you want to marry, first buy an SC/ST certificate and keep it ready. It will also help you in life to prevent false charges of rape and molestation by unknown women as you can file a case under Prevention of Atrocities against SC/ST act against such women. And women who support renuka chowdhury can fuck off and work their ass off on their own to earn money and live on their own as such women do not deserve good husbands in the first place.
If you are not bothered about the marriage being a Hindu marriage, then marry a westernn woman after signing a pre nup with her. Anyway, western women are more likely to sign pre nups than Indian women and if they earn more, they will end up paying maintenance to the husband under the western laws unlike the extremely biased Indian laws. So now, even western women are a better choice for marriage than Indian women for Indian men.
In the light of the changed scenario in India with fucked up laws which put all the power in the hands of the woman with no checks and balances, there is now only one way by which a Hindu marriage can be lasting and safe for the male. The marriage can be safe and lasting when marriage happens between an SC/ST male and a non SC/ST female. The reason is simple. A SC/ST male can file a case without proof saying that his caste was insulted. The female can put a case without proof of dowry and abuse and all the chimichanga that has been given to them by the female renuka chowdhury. So in the case of a marriage between a SC/ST male and a non SC/ST female, the power of both parties is somewhat balanced (responsibility is still unfotunately put as a burden on the male...he is still expected to provide for the family even if the bitch is educated). But it is a lot better than a non SC/ST guy marrying any female because he cannot file a case without proof against his wife and get her arrested...so he is vulnerable to torture by the bitch. So men of India, if you want to marry, first buy an SC/ST certificate and keep it ready. It will also help you in life to prevent false charges of rape and molestation by unknown women as you can file a case under Prevention of Atrocities against SC/ST act against such women. And women who support renuka chowdhury can fuck off and work their ass off on their own to earn money and live on their own as such women do not deserve good husbands in the first place.
If you are not bothered about the marriage being a Hindu marriage, then marry a westernn woman after signing a pre nup with her. Anyway, western women are more likely to sign pre nups than Indian women and if they earn more, they will end up paying maintenance to the husband under the western laws unlike the extremely biased Indian laws. So now, even western women are a better choice for marriage than Indian women for Indian men.
posted by redrajesh at 10:19 AM
3 Comments:
Is this some kind of a humor post. If it is, tell me, I'll have a good laugh about it. If not....just 1 Question- Do you have a bad mom, sister, wife, boss and in-law all together?
If there are examples of women being a nagging money suckers or women who misuse laws, there are triple the examples of dowry deaths, women who have to sacrifice their careers to take care of 'his' family, or women who work 24X7 to balance everything.
Stop abusing women to the extent you do. We know how to remain independent. There can't be a world without women and that's why most women ought to be pampered. Just try being a woman for a day and you'll know.
and yeah, a western woman is not going to take care of your parents...or might leave the babies to nanny.
Don't dare abuse Indian women...you don't know them.
1)If women are being asked for dowry, then they better not marry the guy who asks for it or they can walk out of the marriage as soon as the husband asks for one (IF they are actually capable of being independent). If they want to live on the husbands money, then they better bring dowry, otherwise the husband has no benefit in taking care of some woman who cannot bring money to the household.
2)If women are being told to sacrifice their career to take care of "his' family, they can as well refuse and he has no legal recourse to do anything to her for not doing her work. But if he does not buy her a car if she wants, she can claim harassment and put him in jail under the new laws. Or if she is having an affair and wants to make some money while leaving for the new guy, she can make a false claim and take money out of him while doing so. "He", cannot do the same to her.
3) If she works 24/7 to balance things, she can as well decide not to do housework or babycare or taking care of "his" parents and there is nothing "he" can do about it.
Ultimately, the power is with her, her and only her. And there are thousands of women in India who dont cook or take care of the kids or take care of the parents. The ayah does all that and all that the woman does is just suck the husbands blood. And the claim that only women can take care of the kids holds no water. Childbearing is the only thing that women need to do. Rearing, can be done equally well by both the man and the woman(just like women claim that they can work as well as men at the office)
And if women still dont help themselves by being independent, no amount of laws can help them. Women who took their young days for granted and did not study thinking that all they have to do is get married and then live off the husbands money deserve to face the consequences of their actions in the form of dowry or any such thing. Women got liberated the day they got jobs and are just lazy to live on their own money. The facility which you get in marriage to live off the husbands money is a privilege and not a right.
Try being a man who has the responsibility of providing for the family and now on top of it, living with the fear of false cases being filed on him at any time.
If you have a son, you better be worried about his future as things are going to get a lot worse before they get better.
And if you women can actually be independent, marry younger men who earn less than you and the men can stay at home and sleep in the afternoon and watch those sun tv serials at 9 pm.
Post a Comment
<< Home